%PDF-1.4
%
178 0 obj
<>
endobj
177 0 obj
<>stream
2016-08-26T15:36:21Z
2016-09-16T00:11:30-07:00
XPP
2016-09-16T00:11:30-07:00
application/pdf
Identification of Components of the SUMOylation Machinery in Candida glabrata
uuid:8b19839f-1dd2-11b2-0a00-9209271dc500
uuid:8b1983a3-1dd2-11b2-0a00-1e0000000000
endstream
endobj
175 0 obj
<>
endobj
173 0 obj
<>
endobj
4 0 obj
<>
endobj
103 0 obj
<>
endobj
100 0 obj
<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/XObject<>>>/Rotate 0/TrimBox[9 9 603 792]/Type/Page>>
endobj
112 0 obj
<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/XObject<>>>/Rotate 0/TrimBox[9 9 603 792]/Type/Page>>
endobj
123 0 obj
<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/XObject<>>>/Rotate 0/TrimBox[9 9 603 792]/Type/Page>>
endobj
129 0 obj
<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/XObject<>>>/Rotate 0/TrimBox[9 9 603 792]/Type/Page>>
endobj
140 0 obj
<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/XObject<>>>/Rotate 0/TrimBox[9 9 603 792]/Type/Page>>
endobj
146 0 obj
<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/XObject<>>>/Rotate 0/TrimBox[9 9 603 792]/Type/Page>>
endobj
154 0 obj
<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]/XObject<>>>/Rotate 0/TrimBox[9 9 603 792]/Type/Page>>
endobj
233 0 obj
<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text]>>/Type/Page>>
endobj
263 0 obj
[269 0 R 270 0 R 271 0 R 272 0 R 273 0 R 274 0 R]
endobj
264 0 obj
<>stream
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
12 0 0 12 240.01199 653.99991 Tm
(Mishra and Rupinder Kaur)Tj
-11.33149 1 Td
(Rahul Gujjula, Sangeetha Veeraiah, Kundan Kumar, Suman S. Thakur, Krishn\
aveni)Tj
/T1_1 1 Tf
0.13444 1.00001 Td
(ROLE OF THE DESUMOYLATION PEPTIDASE CgUlp2 IN VIRULENCE)Tj
33.93303 1 Td
(:)Tj
/T1_2 1 Tf
-7.19601 0 Td
(Candida glabrata)Tj
/T1_1 1 Tf
-27.61095 0 Td
(Identification of Components of the SUMOylation Machinery in )Tj
ET
BT
/T1_3 1 Tf
10 0 0 10 98 625.99997 Tm
(doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.706044 originally published online July 5, 2016)Tj
6.50199 1 Td
(2016, 291:19573-19589.)Tj
-6.50199 0 Td
(J. Biol. Chem.\240)Tj
ET
98 602 m
519 602 l
0 0 m
S
BT
ET
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
10 0 0 10 98 557.99997 Tm
(\240 )Tj
/T1_4 1 Tf
35.46296 1 Td
( )Tj
0 0 1 rg
-11.56299 0 Td
(10.1074/jbc.M115.706044)Tj
0 g
-23.89997 0 Td
(Access the most updated version of this article at doi: )Tj
ET
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
10 0 0 10 129.11993 543 Tm
(\240)Tj
/T1_4 1 Tf
-3.11199 0 Td
(Alerts: )Tj
ET
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
10 0 0 10 118 512.99994 Tm
(\240 )Tj
/T1_4 1 Tf
19.52397 1 Td
( )Tj
0 0 1 rg
-18.61797 0 Td
(When a correction for this article is posted)Tj
0 g
-0.906 0 Td
(\225\240 )Tj
11.68699 1.00001 Td
( )Tj
0 0 1 rg
-10.78099 0 Td
(When this article is cited)Tj
0 g
-0.906 0 Td
(\225\240 )Tj
ET
BT
/T1_4 1 Tf
10 0 0 10 142.44986 498 Tm
( to choose from all of JBC's e-mail alerts)Tj
0 0 1 rg
-4.44499 0 Td
(Click here)Tj
ET
BT
0 g
/T1_0 1 Tf
10 0 0 10 98 452.99994 Tm
(\240 )Tj
/T1_4 1 Tf
25.78895 1 Td
( )Tj
0 0 1 rg
-25.78895 0 Td
(http://www.jbc.org/content/291/37/19573.full.html#ref-list-1)Tj
0 g
0 1.00001 TD
(This article cites 58 references, 38 of which can be accessed free at)Tj
ET
BT
/T1_0 1 Tf
0 -8 8 0 587 487.15991 Tm
( at CENTRE FOR DNA FINGERPRINTING AND DIAGNOSTICS on September 16, 2016)Tj
0 0 1 rg
-7.88899 0 Td
(http://www.jbc.org/)Tj
0 g
-7.55399 0 Td
(Downloaded from )Tj
ET
endstream
endobj
238 0 obj
<>
endobj
265 0 obj
<>
endobj
266 0 obj
<>
endobj
267 0 obj
<>
endobj
268 0 obj
<>
endobj
269 0 obj
<>
endobj
270 0 obj
<>
endobj
271 0 obj
<>
endobj
272 0 obj
<>
endobj
273 0 obj
<>
endobj
274 0 obj
<>
endobj
280 0 obj
<>
endobj
279 0 obj
<>
endobj
278 0 obj
<>
endobj
277 0 obj
<>
endobj
276 0 obj
<>
endobj
275 0 obj
<>
endobj
259 0 obj
[281 0 R]
endobj
260 0 obj
<>stream
H|W[s:~_G<rrS-ĶXI&m], 0^ndIE/G_NfŚ:+5R
ydE\a@
W˫a\0<n`,|Y[Wwg71DR?zջmݓpapi86%p{8i⌦1'g4(c7|AIHKC'YK8U56v䌷AF0 lvU۬QeEҬBpB5mVl+ P#i{m%`j+4KǜA/C;#ZäE7O>
_ϳep9ۿ